Edward R Mariano, David M Dickerson, Joseph W Szokol, Michael Harned, Jeffrey T Mueller, Beverly K Philip, Jaime L Baratta, Padma Gulur, Jennifer Robles, Kristopher M Schroeder, Karla E K Wyatt, Jason M Schwalb, Eric S Schwenk, Richa Wardhan, Todd S Kim, Kent K Higdon, Deepak G Krishnan, Ashley M Shilling, Gary Schwartz, Lisa Wiechmann, Lisa V Doan, Nabil M Elkassabany, Stephen C Yang, Iyabo O Muse, Jean D Eloy, Vikas Mehta, Shalini Shah, Rebecca L Johnson, Michael J Englesbe, Amanda Kallen, S Bobby Mukkamala, Ashley Walton, Asokumar Buvanendran
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
4
6%
Nursing and Health Professions
3
5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
2
3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
1
2%
Other
4
6%
Unknown
31
47%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#315,732
of 26,496,895 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#23
of 2,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,960
of 441,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,496,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
