You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms2380 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott R. Loss, Tom Will, Peter P. Marra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 801 | 16% |
| Spain | 223 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 191 | 4% |
| Canada | 140 | 3% |
| Japan | 127 | 2% |
| Chile | 106 | 2% |
| France | 66 | 1% |
| Mexico | 60 | 1% |
| Germany | 51 | <1% |
| Other | 665 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2674 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4373 | 86% |
| Scientists | 550 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 101 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 60 | 1% |
| Unknown | 20 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1441 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 281 | 19% |
| Researcher | 230 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 211 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 186 | 12% |
| Other | 99 | 7% |
| Other | 222 | 15% |
| Unknown | 281 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 635 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 256 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 87 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 1% |
| Other | 141 | 9% |
| Unknown | 327 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6830. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#440
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6
of 58,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 292,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.