↓ Skip to main content

Adapt or die: how the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,447)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1450 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adapt or die: how the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent
Published in
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, July 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trisha Greenhalgh, David Fisman, Danielle J Cane, Matthew Oliver, Chandini Raina Macintyre

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,450 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Librarian 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 40 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 43 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 836. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2024.
All research outputs
#23,625
of 26,233,985 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#12
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#786
of 441,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,233,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.