The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hidden in plain sight: the covering of patients’ eyes and a microethics of medical photography
|
---|---|
Published in |
Medical Humanities, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1136/medhum-2024-012894 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christine Slobogin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 7 | 54% |
Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,377,997
of 26,621,386 outputs
Outputs from Medical Humanities
#260
of 800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,626
of 247,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Humanities
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,621,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.