The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.12181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. M. Aplin, D. R. Farine, J. Morand‐Ferron, E. F. Cole, A. Cockburn, B. C. Sheldon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 51% |
| Scientists | 16 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 701 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 670 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 174 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 119 | 17% |
| Researcher | 100 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 96 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 72 | 10% |
| Unknown | 113 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 417 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 51 | 7% |
| Psychology | 25 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 6% |
| Unknown | 146 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#342,238
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#126
of 3,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,458
of 215,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.