The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Breast-Cancer Risk in Families with Mutations in PALB2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1400382 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonis C Antoniou, Silvia Casadei, Tuomas Heikkinen, Daniel Barrowdale, Katri Pylkäs, Jonathan Roberts, Andrew Lee, Deepak Subramanian, Kim De Leeneer, Florentia Fostira, Eva Tomiak, Susan L Neuhausen, Zhi L Teo, Sofia Khan, Kristiina Aittomäki, Jukka S Moilanen, Clare Turnbull, Sheila Seal, Arto Mannermaa, Anne Kallioniemi, Geoffrey J Lindeman, Saundra S Buys, Irene L Andrulis, Paolo Radice, Carlo Tondini, Siranoush Manoukian, Amanda E Toland, Penelope Miron, Jeffrey N Weitzel, Susan M Domchek, Bruce Poppe, Kathleen B M Claes, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Patrick Concannon, Jonine L Bernstein, Paul A James, Douglas F Easton, David E Goldgar, John L Hopper, Nazneen Rahman, Paolo Peterlongo, Heli Nevanlinna, Mary-Claire King, Fergus J Couch, Melissa C Southey, Robert Winqvist, William D Foulkes, Marc Tischkowitz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 8% |
| Spain | 14 | 8% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Italy | 5 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 64% |
| Scientists | 35 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 675 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 660 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 113 | 17% |
| Researcher | 90 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 9% |
| Other | 50 | 7% |
| Other | 114 | 17% |
| Unknown | 159 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 142 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 6% |
| Unknown | 176 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 918. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2024.
All research outputs
#20,193
of 26,741,253 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#836
of 33,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112
of 242,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#4
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,741,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.