The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 422 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Generation of Functional Human Pancreatic β Cells In Vitro
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felicia W. Pagliuca, Jeffrey R. Millman, Mads Gürtler, Michael Segel, Alana Van Dervort, Jennifer Hyoje Ryu, Quinn P. Peterson, Dale Greiner, Douglas A. Melton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 34 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 17 | 4% |
| Mexico | 11 | 3% |
| Chile | 8 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| Kuwait | 5 | 1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 240 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 327 | 77% |
| Scientists | 56 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2173 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 438 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 385 | 17% |
| Researcher | 347 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 249 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 106 | 5% |
| Other | 313 | 14% |
| Unknown | 407 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 577 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 549 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 236 | 11% |
| Engineering | 147 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 42 | 2% |
| Other | 226 | 10% |
| Unknown | 468 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 942. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#19,141
of 26,559,802 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#142
of 17,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91
of 266,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#1
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.