The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chlorhexidine's role in skin antisepsis: questioning the evidence–Author's reply
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61813-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dennis G Maki |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#38,936
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,216
of 265,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#469
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.