↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative Perfusion Techniques Can Accurately Predict Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis in Breast Reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
276 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraoperative Perfusion Techniques Can Accurately Predict Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis in Breast Reconstruction
Published in
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, May 2012
DOI 10.1097/prs.0b013e31824a2ae8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett T. Phillips, Steven T. Lanier, Nicole Conkling, Eric D. Wang, Alexander B. Dagum, Jason C. Ganz, Sami U. Khan, Duc T. Bui

Abstract

Intraoperative vascular imaging can assist assessment of mastectomy skin flap perfusion to predict areas of necrosis. No head-to-head study has compared modalities such as laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography and fluorescein dye angiography with clinical assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 15%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 37 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#9,363
of 10,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,969
of 175,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#81
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.