↓ Skip to main content

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2011 Update

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
patent
67 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
4569 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2603 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2011 Update
Published in
Circulation, December 2010
DOI 10.1161/cir.0b013e3182009701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Véronique L Roger, Alan S Go, Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Robert J Adams, Jarett D Berry, Todd M Brown, Mercedes R Carnethon, Shifan Dai, Giovanni de Simone, Earl S Ford, Caroline S Fox, Heather J Fullerton, Cathleen Gillespie, Kurt J Greenlund, Susan M Hailpern, John A Heit, P Michael Ho, Virginia J Howard, Brett M Kissela, Steven J Kittner, Daniel T Lackland, Judith H Lichtman, Lynda D Lisabeth, Diane M Makuc, Gregory M Marcus, Ariane Marelli, David B Matchar, Mary M McDermott, James B Meigs, Claudia S Moy, Dariush Mozaffarian, Michael E Mussolino, Graham Nichol, Nina P Paynter, Wayne D Rosamond, Paul D Sorlie, Randall S Stafford, Tanya N Turan, Melanie B Turner, Nathan D Wong, Judith Wylie-Rosett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 45 2%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Netherlands 6 <1%
Italy 6 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 20 <1%
Unknown 2501 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 436 17%
Student > Master 329 13%
Researcher 326 13%
Student > Bachelor 281 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 175 7%
Other 568 22%
Unknown 488 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 857 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 288 11%
Engineering 226 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 161 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 99 4%
Other 396 15%
Unknown 576 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#432,137
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#1,191
of 21,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,687
of 193,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#3
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.