↓ Skip to main content

Insights from a general practice service evaluation supporting a lower carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: a secondary analysis of routine clinic data…

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health , November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 259)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
2350 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights from a general practice service evaluation supporting a lower carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: a secondary analysis of routine clinic data including HbA1c, weight and prescribing over 6 years
Published in
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health , November 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000072
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Unwin, Ali Ahsan Khalid, Jen Unwin, Dominic Crocombe, Christine Delon, Kathy Martyn, Rajna Golubic, Sumantra Ray

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,350 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 56 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 60 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1722. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,533
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
#3
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312
of 446,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 115.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.