↓ Skip to main content

Anesthesia Duration as a Marker for Surgical Complications in Office-Based Plastic Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Plastic Surgery, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anesthesia Duration as a Marker for Surgical Complications in Office-Based Plastic Surgery
Published in
Annals of Plastic Surgery, October 2012
DOI 10.1097/sap.0b013e31825f4e5a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett T. Phillips, Eric D. Wang, Alexandra J. Rodman, Paul A. Watterson, Kevin L. Smith, Stephan J. Finical, Felmont F. Eaves, Michael E. Beasley, Sami U. Khan

Abstract

Office-based plastic surgery has continued to rise in the past 2 decades with the increased demand for cosmetic surgery. Although several large studies have shown the safety of office-based surgery, current regulations place some restrictions on ambulatory office-based surgical facilities. To provide further evidence-based literature on the safety of office-based plastic surgery, we examine surgical complication rates as a function of anesthesia duration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Unspecified 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Plastic Surgery
#1,848
of 3,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,864
of 190,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Plastic Surgery
#19
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,909 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.