↓ Skip to main content

World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 6,625)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
5294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6912 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, November 2020
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona C Bull, Salih S Al-Ansari, Stuart Biddle, Katja Borodulin, Matthew P Buman, Greet Cardon, Catherine Carty, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Sebastien Chastin, Roger Chou, Paddy C Dempsey, Loretta DiPietro, Ulf Ekelund, Joseph Firth, Christine M Friedenreich, Leandro Garcia, Muthoni Gichu, Russell Jago, Peter T Katzmarzyk, Estelle Lambert, Michael Leitzmann, Karen Milton, Francisco B Ortega, Chathuranga Ranasinghe, Emmanuel Stamatakis, Anne Tiedemann, Richard P Troiano, Hidde P van der Ploeg, Vicky Wari, Juana F Willumsen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,418 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6,912 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6912 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 698 10%
Student > Bachelor 661 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 449 6%
Researcher 368 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 249 4%
Other 1089 16%
Unknown 3398 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 829 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 713 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 687 10%
Unspecified 188 3%
Social Sciences 157 2%
Other 739 11%
Unknown 3599 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2560. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,118
of 26,222,667 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#15
of 6,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173
of 534,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.