The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of drying treatments on antioxidant capacity of forage legume leaves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Food Science and Technology, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13197-011-0596-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saw Yei Sang, Fazrina Jamharee, K. Nagendra Prasad, Azrina Azlan, Nurzillah Maliki |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#328
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,605
of 242,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.