↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic and biochemical changes in streptozotocin induced obese-diabetic rats treated with Phyllanthus niruri extract

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic and biochemical changes in streptozotocin induced obese-diabetic rats treated with Phyllanthus niruri extract
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.06.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Mediani, Faridah Abas, M. Maulidiani, Alfi Khatib, Chin Ping Tan, Intan Safinar Ismail, Khozirah Shaari, Amin Ismail, N.H. Lajis

Abstract

Herbal medicine has been proven to be an effective therapy offering a variety of benefits, such as moderate reduction in hypoglycemia, in the treatment and prevention of obesity and diabetes. Phyllanthus niruri has been used as a treatment for diabetes mellitus. Herein, the induction of type 2 diabetes in Sprague-Dawley rats was achieved by a low dose of streptozotocin (STZ) (25mg/kgbw). Here, we evaluated the in vivo antidiabetic properties of two concentrations (250 and 500mg/kg bw) of P. niruri via metabolomics approach. The administration of 500mg/kgbw of P. niruri extract caused the metabolic disorders of obese diabetic rats to be improved towards the normal state. The extract also clearly decreased the serum glucose level and improved the lipid profile in obese diabetic rats. The results of this study may contribute towards better understanding the molecular mechanism of this medicinal plant in managing diabetes mellitus.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Lecturer 8 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 42 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Chemistry 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 50 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis
#2,683
of 4,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,971
of 354,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis
#32
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,794 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.