↓ Skip to main content

Risk assessment of fatal accidents due to work at heights activities using fault tree analysis: Case study in Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Safety Science, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk assessment of fatal accidents due to work at heights activities using fault tree analysis: Case study in Malaysia
Published in
Safety Science, July 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105724
Authors

Abderrahim Zermane, Mohd Zahirasri Mohd Tohir, Mohd Rafee Baharudin, Hamdan Mohamed Yusoff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 93 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 93 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Safety Science
#592
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,389
of 439,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Safety Science
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.