↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of massage on muscle soreness, perceived recovery, physiological restoration and physical performance in male bodybuilders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
45 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of massage on muscle soreness, perceived recovery, physiological restoration and physical performance in male bodybuilders
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, September 2015
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2015.1081264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehdi Kargarfard, Eddie T.C. Lam, Ardalan Shariat, Ina Shaw, Brandon S. Shaw, Shamsul B.M. Tamrin

Abstract

It is believed that sport massage after intensive exercise might improve power and perceptual recovery in athletes. However, few studies have been done in this area. This study aimed to examine the effect of massage on the performance of bodybuilders. Thirty experienced male bodybuilders were randomly assigned to either a massage group (n = 15) or a control group (n = 15). Both groups performed five repetition sets at 75-77% of 1RM of knee extensor and flexor muscle groups. The massage group then received a 30-min massage after the exercise protocol while the control group maintained their normal passive recovery. Criteria under investigation included: plasma creatine kinase (CK) level, agility test, vertical jump test, isometric torque test, and perception of soreness. All variables were measured over 6 time periods: baseline, immediately after the DOMS inducing protocol, right after the massage, and 24, 48, and 72 h after the massage. Both groups showed significant (P < .001) decreases in jumping, agility performance, and isometric torque, but significant (P < .001) increases in CK and muscle soreness levels. The massage group in general demonstrated a better recovery rate. As such, a post-exercise massage session can improve the exercise performance and recovery rate in male bodybuilders after intensive exercise.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 437 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 86 19%
Student > Master 65 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 28 6%
Researcher 25 6%
Other 61 14%
Unknown 144 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 135 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 11%
Neuroscience 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 37 8%
Unknown 152 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#584,003
of 26,004,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#144
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,379
of 278,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#3
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,004,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.