↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: focus on the cancer hallmark of tumor angiogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Carcinogenesis, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: focus on the cancer hallmark of tumor angiogenesis
Published in
Carcinogenesis, June 2015
DOI 10.1093/carcin/bgv036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiwei Hu, Samira A. Brooks, Valérian Dormoy, Chia-Wen Hsu, Hsue-Yin Hsu, Liang-Tzung Lin, Thierry Massfelder, W.Kimryn Rathmell, Menghang Xia, Fahd Al-Mulla, Rabeah Al-Temaimi, Amedeo Amedei, Dustin G. Brown, Kalan R. Prudhomme, Anna Maria Colacci, Roslida A. Hamid, Chiara Mondello, Jayadev Raju, Elizabeth P. Ryan, Jordan Woodrick, A.Ivana Scovassi, Neetu Singh, Monica Vaccari, Rabindra Roy, Stefano Forte, Lorenzo Memeo, Hosni K. Salem, Leroy Lowe, Lasse Jensen, William H. Bisson, Nicole Kleinstreuer

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 28%
Other 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#8,218,058
of 26,565,554 outputs
Outputs from Carcinogenesis
#1,594
of 4,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,813
of 278,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carcinogenesis
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,565,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.