↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Knowledge Management, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature
Published in
Journal of Knowledge Management, July 2016
DOI 10.1108/jkm-11-2015-0427
Authors

Gangeswari Tangaraja, Roziah Mohd Rasdi, Bahaman Abu Samah, Maimunah Ismail

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 424 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 7%
Student > Bachelor 27 6%
Lecturer 25 6%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 130 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 152 35%
Social Sciences 43 10%
Computer Science 35 8%
Engineering 20 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 4%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 133 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Knowledge Management
#64
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,113
of 370,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Knowledge Management
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.