The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effects of Herbs and Fruits on Leukaemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2014/494136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tayebeh Azam Saedi, Sabariah Md Noor, Patimah Ismail, Fauziah Othman |
| Abstract |
In developing countries, herbal therapy is the first and basis form of treatment for most types of diseases. About 75-80% of the world's population prefers herbal therapy as a major treatment due to its better adequacy and satisfactoriness, which enhance human body's symmetry with minimal side effects. Fruits and plants have been presented from the past as promising tools in becoming a natural anticancer agents. Many of these plant extracts are currently used in cancer therapy and prevention. This review paper will particularly explore and emphasize on herbs and fruits used in the treatment of the leukaemia. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,956,576
of 26,560,265 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#613
of 9,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,956
of 247,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#5
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.