The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Physical, Mechanical, and Morphological Properties of Woven Kenaf/Polymer Composites Produced Using a Vacuum Infusion Technique
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Polymer Science, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1155/2015/894565 |
Authors |
Suhad D. Salman, Mohaiman J. Sharba, Z. Leman, M. T. H. Sultan, M. R. Ishak, F. Cardona |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
Researcher | 12 | 7% |
Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 47 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 72 | 43% |
Materials Science | 23 | 14% |
Chemical Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 56 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Polymer Science
#104
of 158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,161
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Polymer Science
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.