The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the Effect of Aqueous Momordica charantia Linn. Extract on Zebrafish Embryo Model through Acute Toxicity Assay Assessment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1155/2019/9152757 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Siroshini K. Thiagarajan, Khamini Rama Krishnan, Thandar Ei, Nurul Husna Shafie, Daryl J. Arapoc, Hasnah Bahari |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 18% |
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Lecturer | 8 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 41 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 45 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#24,075,921
of 26,794,105 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#6,584
of 9,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,133
of 367,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#138
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.