The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The genome and life-stage specific transcriptomes of Globodera pallidaelucidate key aspects of plant parasitism by a cyst nematode
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r43 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James A Cotton, Catherine J Lilley, Laura M Jones, Taisei Kikuchi, Adam J Reid, Peter Thorpe, Isheng J Tsai, Helen Beasley, Vivian Blok, Peter J A Cock, Sebastian Eves-van den Akker, Nancy Holroyd, Martin Hunt, Sophie Mantelin, Hardeep Naghra, Arnab Pain, Juan E Palomares-Rius, Magdalena Zarowiecki, Matthew Berriman, John T Jones, Peter E Urwin |
Abstract |
Globodera pallida is a devastating pathogen of potato crops, making it one of the most economically important plant parasitic nematodes. It is also an important model for the biology of cyst nematodes. Cyst nematodes and root-knot nematodes are the two most important plant parasitic nematode groups and together represent a global threat to food security. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 23% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 257 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 21% |
Researcher | 43 | 16% |
Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
Other | 15 | 6% |
Other | 42 | 16% |
Unknown | 52 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 144 | 54% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 2% |
Engineering | 4 | 1% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
Other | 18 | 7% |
Unknown | 58 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,040,435
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,707
of 4,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,067
of 236,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#32
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.