↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of porogen factors for the preparation of ion imprinted polymer monoliths used in mercury removal

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of porogen factors for the preparation of ion imprinted polymer monoliths used in mercury removal
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0195546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siti Khadijah Ab. Rahman, Nor Azah Yusof, Abdul Halim Abdullah, Faruq Mohammad, Azni Idris, Hamad A. Al-lohedan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,626,291
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,330
of 198,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,227
of 329,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,500
of 3,438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.