The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of Ulva reticulata as a growth supplement for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0270604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nor Jawahir Abu, Japar Sidik Bujang, Muta Harah Zakaria, Shahrizim Zulkifly |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Energy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,777,064
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,521
of 194,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,513
of 438,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,271
of 4,708 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,708 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.