The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Foam Glass-Ceramics with Different Composition Derived from Ark Clamshell (ACS) and Soda Lime Silica (SLS) Glass Bottles Sintered at Various Temperatures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Materials, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3390/ma14030570 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Noor Aizat Noor Hisham, Mohd Hafiz Mohd Zaid, Sidek Hj Ab Aziz, Farah Diana Muhammad |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Researcher | 1 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Materials Science | 2 | 10% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,627,117
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Materials
#1,124
of 7,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,900
of 505,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials
#37
of 432 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,935 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 432 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.