You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cutting Processes of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Polymers, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/polym12061332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fathi Masoud, S.M. Sapuan, Mohd Khairol Anuar Mohd Ariffin, Y. Nukman, Emin Bayraktar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 34% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,645,091
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Polymers
#794
of 5,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,358
of 399,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polymers
#36
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.