The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between household food insecurity and nutritional outcomes among children in Northeastern of Peninsular Malaysia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Research and Practice, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.4162/nrp.2014.8.3.304 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ihab Ali Naser, Rohana Jalil, Wan Manan Wan Muda, Wan Suriati Wan Nik, Zalilah Mohd Shariff, Mohamed Rusli Abdullah |
| Abstract |
The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between household food insecurity and nutritional status of children in low-income households. A cross sectional study involved a survey of households (n = 223) receiving the financial assistance. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 327 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Unknown | 125 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,810,856
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Research and Practice
#82
of 471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,596
of 241,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Research and Practice
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.