↓ Skip to main content

Effects of plyometric training on measures of physical fitness in racket sport athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of plyometric training on measures of physical fitness in racket sport athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
PeerJ, December 2023
DOI 10.7717/peerj.16638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuannuan Deng, Kim Geok Soh, Borhannudin Abdullah, Dandan Huang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 17 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 7 27%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 16 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,021,581
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#7,793
of 15,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,142
of 351,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#118
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.