↓ Skip to main content

Cell Culture, Technology: Enhancing the Culture of Diagnosing Human Diseases.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
469 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell Culture, Technology: Enhancing the Culture of Diagnosing Human Diseases.
Published in
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, January 2016
DOI 10.7860/jcdr/2016/15837.7460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuaibu Abdullahi Hudu, Ahmed Subeh Alshrari, Ahmad Syahida, Zamberi Sekawi

Abstract

Cell culture involves a complex of processes of cell isolation from their natural environment (in vivo) and subsequent growth in a controlled environmental artificial condition (in vitro). Cells from specific tissues or organs are cultured as short term or established cell lines which are widely used for research and diagnosis, most specially in the aspect of viral infection, because pathogenic viral isolation depends on the availability of permissible cell cultures. Cell culture provides the required setting for the detection and identification of numerous pathogens of humans, which is achieved via virus isolation in the cell culture as the "gold standard" for virus discovery. In this review, we summarized the views of researchers on the current role of cell culture technology in the diagnosis of human diseases. The technological advancement of recent years, starting with monoclonal antibody development to molecular techniques, provides an important approach for detecting presence of viral infection. They are also used as a baseline for establishing rapid tests for newly discovered pathogens. A combination of virus isolation in cell culture and molecular methods is still critical in identifying viruses that were previously unrecognized. Therefore, cell culture should be considered as a fundamental procedure in identifying suspected infectious viral agent.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 467 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 120 26%
Student > Master 60 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 3%
Other 44 9%
Unknown 179 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 4%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 191 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,460,520
of 26,404,318 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
#157
of 1,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,219
of 403,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
#37
of 494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,404,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.