↓ Skip to main content

免震液体貯蔵タンクを対象としたサブストラクチャーハイブリッド振動台実験

Overview of attention for article published in 地震工学研究発表会 梗概集, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
免震液体貯蔵タンクを対象としたサブストラクチャーハイブリッド振動台実験
Published in
地震工学研究発表会 梗概集, June 2010
DOI 10.11532/proee2003.27.158
Authors

五十嵐 晃, 家村 浩和, 鶴田 大輝

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#17,732,227
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from 地震工学研究発表会 梗概集
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,340
of 107,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 地震工学研究発表会 梗概集
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them