The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Observation of a predaceous gall midge, Lestodiplosis sp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), preying on the larvae of the smaller tea tortrix, Adoxophyes honmai Yasuda, and the oriental tea tortrix, Homona magnanima Diakonoff (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.4165/kapps.52.109 |
Authors |
Akihito Ozawa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society
#21
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,373
of 172,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them