↓ Skip to main content

〈ゴジラ〉から〈メカゴジラ〉へ 「怪獣」の沖縄来島をめぐる考察

Overview of attention for article published in ASIA CULTURE HISTORY, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
〈ゴジラ〉から〈メカゴジラ〉へ 「怪獣」の沖縄来島をめぐる考察
Published in
ASIA CULTURE HISTORY, September 2020
DOI 10.34575/asiach.11.0_130
Authors

柳井 貴士

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,708,140
of 25,956,379 outputs
Outputs from ASIA CULTURE HISTORY
#3
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,772
of 428,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ASIA CULTURE HISTORY
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,956,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.