↓ Skip to main content

シャハトのメフォ手形

Overview of attention for article published in Shakai keizai shigaku, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 142)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
シャハトのメフォ手形
Published in
Shakai keizai shigaku, September 2017
DOI 10.20624/sehs.60.5_655
Authors

川瀬 泰史

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,916,691
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Shakai keizai shigaku
#6
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,880
of 330,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shakai keizai shigaku
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.