↓ Skip to main content

Selectively Iterative Detection Scheme Based on the Residual Power in MIMO-OFDM

Overview of attention for article published in IEICE Transactions on Communications, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selectively Iterative Detection Scheme Based on the Residual Power in MIMO-OFDM
Published in
IEICE Transactions on Communications, December 2018
DOI 10.1587/transcom.2018ebp3007
Authors

Jong-Kwang KIM, Seung-Jin CHOI, Young-Hwan YOU, Hyoung-Kyu SONG

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from IEICE Transactions on Communications
#447
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,270
of 445,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEICE Transactions on Communications
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.