↓ Skip to main content

Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1771 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1483 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2005
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0505734102
Pubmed ID
Authors

David D. Breshears, Neil S. Cobb, Paul M. Rich, Kevin P. Price, Craig D. Allen, Randy G. Balice, William H. Romme, Jude H. Kastens, M. Lisa Floyd, Jayne Belnap, Jesse J. Anderson, Orrin B. Myers, Clifton W. Meyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,483 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 56 4%
Canada 8 <1%
Australia 6 <1%
South Africa 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
China 4 <1%
France 4 <1%
Argentina 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Other 18 1%
Unknown 1372 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 313 21%
Researcher 310 21%
Student > Master 219 15%
Student > Bachelor 95 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 80 5%
Other 246 17%
Unknown 220 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 453 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 423 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 186 13%
Engineering 38 3%
Social Sciences 25 2%
Other 75 5%
Unknown 283 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#278,543
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,088
of 104,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321
of 72,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8
of 593 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 593 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.