↓ Skip to main content

Alcohol Consumption and Multiple Dysplastic Lesions Increase Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Esophagus, Head, and Neck

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alcohol Consumption and Multiple Dysplastic Lesions Increase Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Esophagus, Head, and Neck
Published in
Gastroenterology, August 2016
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.07.040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chikatoshi Katada, Tetsuji Yokoyama, Tomonori Yano, Kazuhiro Kaneko, Ichiro Oda, Yuichi Shimizu, Hisashi Doyama, Tomoyuki Koike, Kohei Takizawa, Motohiro Hirao, Hiroyuki Okada, Takako Yoshii, Kazuo Konishi, Takenori Yamanouchi, Takashi Tsuda, Tai Omori, Nozomu Kobayashi, Tadakazu Shimoda, Atsushi Ochiai, Yusuke Amanuma, Shinya Ohashi, Tomonari Matsuda, Hideki Ishikawa, Akira Yokoyama, Manabu Muto

Abstract

Some patients develop multiple squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) in the upper aero-digestive tract, attributed to field cancerization; alcohol consumption has been associated with this process. We examined the association between multiple areas of dysplastic squamous epithelium with development of SCC of the esophagus or head and neck cancer, as well as alcohol consumption and smoking. We examined 331 patients with early-stage esophageal SCC using lugol chromoendoscopy to evaluate the dysplastic squamous epithelium in the esophagus. Patients were then assigned to 3 groups, based on number of lugol-voiding lesions (LVL): A=no lesion, B=1-9 lesions, C=10 or more lesions. Participants completed lifestyle surveys on histories of drinking, smoking, and diet. All participants were evaluated by laryngo-pharyngoscopy before registration; only those without head and neck cancer were included, except for patients with superficial SCC limited to the subepithelial layer. Lesions detected in the esophagus and head and neck by surveillance were considered to be metachronous. The study endpoint was the cumulative incidence of metachronous SCCs in the esophagus and head and neck after endoscopic resection of esophageal SCC, according to the grade of LVL. At study entry, all patients were instructed to abstain from alcohol and smoking. Over the 2 year study period, metachronous SCCs of the esophagus were detected in 4% of patients in group A, 9.4% of patients in group B, and 24.7% of patients in group C (P<.0001 for patients in group A vs B or B vs C). Head and neck SCCs were detected in none of the patients in group A, 1.7% of the patients in group B, and 8.6% of the patients in group C (P=.016 for patients in group A vs C and P=.008 for patients in group B vs C). SCC of the esophagus or head and neck developed in 4.0% of patients in group A, 10.0% of patients in group B, and 31.4% of patients in group C (P<.0001 for group A vs group B or group A vs C). Alcohol abstinence decreased the risk of multiple SCC of the esophagus (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.25-0.91; P=.025), whereas smoking abstinence did not. Multiple dysplastic lesions in the esophagus increase risk of multiple SCCs. Alcohol abstinence reduces risk of metachronous SCC. Clinical Trials Registry ID no: UMIN000001676 and UMIN000005466.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 40 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,359,955
of 26,126,599 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#1,247
of 12,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,089
of 384,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#20
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,126,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.