The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
RT-PCR Screening Tests for SARS-CoV-2 with Saliva Samples in Asymptomatic People: Strategy to Maintain Social and Economic Activities while Reducing the Risk of Spreading the Virus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Keio Journal of Medicine, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.2302/kjm.2021-0003-oa |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Junna Oba, Hiroaki Taniguchi, Masae Sato, Reika Takamatsu, Satoru Morikawa, Taneaki Nakagawa, Hiromasa Takaishi, Hideyuki Saya, Koichi Matsuo, Hiroshi Nishihara |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 52 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 59 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 39 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 39 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#889,243
of 26,576,308 outputs
Outputs from Keio Journal of Medicine
#3
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,459
of 460,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Keio Journal of Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,576,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them