↓ Skip to main content

強い紐帯の合理的な弱さ

Overview of attention for article published in Riron to Hoho, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
強い紐帯の合理的な弱さ
Published in
Riron to Hoho, August 2007
DOI 10.11218/ojjams.21.131
Authors

フラハ アンドレアス, 山本 英弘

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Psychology 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Riron to Hoho
#145
of 201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,629
of 76,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Riron to Hoho
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them