You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ウイルス感染症対策としてのCO2濃度の利用にむけた値の解釈について
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.11447/jjra.sra-0364 |
| Authors |
奥田 知明, 村上 道夫, 内藤 航, 篠原 直秀, 藤井 健吉 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,002,252
of 26,097,697 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis
#8
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,212
of 458,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,097,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them