The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impacts of tillage practices on hoppers and predatory wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in rice paddies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Entomology and Zoology, May 2004
|
DOI | 10.1303/aez.2004.155 |
Authors |
Chikara Ishijima, Takashi Motobayashi, Madoka Nakai, Yasuhisa Kunimi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 52% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Applied Entomology and Zoology
#331
of 377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,556
of 63,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them