↓ Skip to main content

複線径路・等至性モデル(TEM)による送球イップス経験者の心理プロセスの検討

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Qualitative Psychology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
複線径路・等至性モデル(TEM)による送球イップス経験者の心理プロセスの検討
Published in
Japanese Journal of Qualitative Psychology, July 2020
DOI 10.24525/jaqp.15.1_159
Authors

向 晃佑

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,355,132
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Qualitative Psychology
#8
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,277
of 432,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Qualitative Psychology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.