↓ Skip to main content

マカダミアナッツ多量摂取を契機に発症した劇症肝炎の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Kanzo, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 229)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
マカダミアナッツ多量摂取を契機に発症した劇症肝炎の1例
Published in
Kanzo, May 2021
DOI 10.2957/kanzo.62.327
Authors

柴田 昌幸, 高森 頼雪, 江川 優子, 山口 智央, 中川 慧人, 中村 めぐみ, 大江 啓史, 成田 圭, 田中 由理子, 小林 倫子, 三科 友二, 三科 雅子, 明石 雅博, 笹本 貴広, 土屋 昭彦, 西川 稿, 横田 亜矢, 杉谷 雅彦, 滝川 一, 山中 正己

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,566,867
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Kanzo
#13
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,218
of 460,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kanzo
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them