The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Large-scale Phylogenetic Analysis of Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae), with Reference to Character Evolution and Subgeneric Recognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.18942/apg.201923 |
| Authors |
Hiroshi Noda, Jun Yamashita, Shizuka Fuse, Rachun Pooma, Manop Poopath, Hiroshi Tobe, Minoru N. Tamura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica
#73
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,384
of 428,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them