↓ Skip to main content

Experiment of the Colon Group of Fishes. (IV) (continued)

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1937
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiment of the Colon Group of Fishes. (IV) (continued)
Published in
Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1937
DOI 10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.13.12_1296
Authors

Yutaka YASUKAWA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,484,736
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#5,866
of 7,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#966
of 3,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.