The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground motion models in the western US
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earthquake Spectra, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1177/87552930211011200 |
| Authors |
Peter M Powers, Sanaz Rezaeian, Allison M Shumway, Mark D Petersen, Nicolas Luco, Oliver S Boyd, Morgan P Moschetti, Arthur D Frankel, Eric M Thompson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 42% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,041,051
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Earthquake Spectra
#97
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,545
of 441,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earthquake Spectra
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.