You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fine‐grain beta diversity of Palaearctic grassland vegetation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Vegetation Science, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jvs.13045 |
| Authors |
Iwona Dembicz, Jürgen Dengler, Manuel J. Steinbauer, Thomas J. Matthews, Sándor Bartha, Sabina Burrascano, Alessandro Chiarucci, Goffredo Filibeck, François Gillet, Monika Janišová, Salza Palpurina, David Storch, Werner Ulrich, Svetlana Aćić, Steffen Boch, Juan Antonio Campos, Laura Cancellieri, Marta Carboni, Giampiero Ciaschetti, Timo Conradi, Pieter De Frenne, Jiri Dolezal, Christian Dolnik, Franz Essl, Edy Fantinato, Itziar García‐Mijangos, Gian Pietro Giusso del Galdo, John‐Arvid Grytnes, Riccardo Guarino, Behlül Güler, Jutta Kapfer, Ewelina Klichowska, Łukasz Kozub, Anna Kuzemko, Swantje Löbel, Michael Manthey, Corrado Marcenò, Anne Mimet, Alireza Naqinezhad, Jalil Noroozi, Arkadiusz Nowak, Harald Pauli, Robert K. Peet, Vincent Pellissier, Remigiusz Pielech, Massimo Terzi, Emin Uğurlu, Orsolya Valkó, Iuliia Vasheniak, Kiril Vassilev, Denys Vynokurov, Hannah J. White, Wolfgang Willner, Manuela Winkler, Sebastian Wolfrum, Jinghui Zhang, Idoia Biurrun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 14% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,982,336
of 24,137,933 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vegetation Science
#129
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,643
of 432,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vegetation Science
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.