The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hydraulic Tomography: 3D Hydraulic Conductivity, Fracture Network, and Connectivity in Mudstone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ground Water, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gwat.12915 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire R. Tiedeman, Warren Barrash |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,895,945
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#162
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,668
of 351,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.