The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic diversity is considered important but interpreted narrowly in country reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Current actions and indicators are insufficient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109233 |
| Authors |
Sean Hoban, Catriona D. Campbell, Jessica M. da Silva, Robert Ekblom, W. Chris Funk, Brittany A. Garner, José A. Godoy, Francine Kershaw, Anna J. MacDonald, Joachim Mergeay, Melissa Minter, David O'Brien, Ivan Paz Vinas, Sarah K. Pearson, Sílvia Pérez-Espona, Kevin M. Potter, Isa-Rita M. Russo, Gernot Segelbacher, Cristiano Vernesi, Margaret E. Hunter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 54% |
| Scientists | 25 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#821,450
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#707
of 6,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,066
of 439,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#24
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.