↓ Skip to main content

Land-use change reduces habitat suitability for supporting managed honey bee colonies in the Northern Great Plains

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Land-use change reduces habitat suitability for supporting managed honey bee colonies in the Northern Great Plains
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1603481113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clint R. V. Otto, Cali L. Roth, Benjamin L. Carlson, Matthew D. Smart

Abstract

Human reliance on insect pollination services continues to increase even as pollinator populations exhibit global declines. Increased commodity crop prices and federal subsidies for biofuel crops, such as corn and soybeans, have contributed to rapid land-use change in the US Northern Great Plains (NGP), changes that may jeopardize habitat for honey bees in a part of the country that supports >40% of the US colony stock. We investigated changes in biofuel crop production and grassland land covers surrounding ∼18,000 registered commercial apiaries in North and South Dakota from 2006 to 2014. We then developed habitat selection models to identify remotely sensed land-cover and land-use features that influence apiary site selection by Dakota beekeepers. Our study demonstrates a continual increase in biofuel crops, totaling 1.2 Mha, around registered apiary locations in North and South Dakota. Such crops were avoided by commercial beekeepers when selecting apiary sites in this region. Furthermore, our analysis reveals how grasslands that beekeepers target when selecting commercial apiary locations are becoming less common in eastern North and South Dakota, changes that may have lasting impact on pollinator conservation efforts. Our study highlights how land-use change in the NGP is altering the landscape in ways that are seemingly less conducive to beekeeping. Our models can be used to guide future conservation efforts highlighted in the US national pollinator health strategy by identifying areas that support high densities of commercial apiaries and that have exhibited significant land-use changes.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 229 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 19%
Researcher 37 16%
Student > Master 35 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 68 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 32%
Environmental Science 34 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 82 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#480,956
of 26,404,318 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8,341
of 104,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,971
of 352,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#153
of 946 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,404,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 946 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.